2025.9.1 - 2025.9.7
Weekly Research Summary
Date: 2025.9.1-2025.9.7
1. Overview
Last week I successfully reproduced the Fig.2 in the paper.
2. Activities and Progress
2.1 Code Review
- Reproduced the Fig.2-e,f in the paper:
The main difference with the method last week is the reconstruction parameter
'is_recon_safe'and'is_recon'. The paper use'is_recon', which means it consider all galaxies in EUCLID, include those near the boundary.
And here's the difference between my reproduce-result and the figure data in the paper.
I also tested the other two group of samples called low-mid-sigma and high-mid-sigma (defined in the paper Extended Data Table 1)
And all galaxy samples in a same axes, with four types of webs, respectively:
- Divided samples in other similar methods in the paper. And calculate their 2PCCF. Results are showed in the LaTeX Report.
Here's a preview:
- Calculated the bias(z-weighting) using
fit_bias.py.
3. Challenges
Calculating bias is a totally unfamiliar work for me. I read the definition, tried fit_bias.py, install Corrfunc and finally get a fig, but I cannot explain it fluently.
The bias of disk galaxies:
4. AI Tools Utilized
-
Chat-GPt-4o. Via Copilot to help me reading codes
-
Claude Sonnet 4. Coding...





